-
In the domain of Political Economy, free scientific inquiry meets not merely the same enemies as in all other domains. The peculiar nature of the materials it deals with, summons as foes into the field of battle the most violent, mean and malignant passions of the human breast, the Furies of private interest. The English Established Church, e.g., will more readily pardon an attack on 38 of its 39 articles than on 1/39 of its income. Now-a-days atheism is culpa levis [a relatively slight sin, c.f. mortal sin], as compared with criticism of existing property relations.
Karl Marx, in his 1867 preface to the first German edition of Capital, vol. 1.
This passage, I feel, accurately (dialectically, “on its head”) may describe the etiology of the “culture wars”: knowing full well that poor and middle class people care less existentially for their pittance of property than the wealthy do (viz. they have less to lose and more to gain, and know it), but still care much for spiritual and cultural matters (these being, in the absence of the corruption of mass wealth, the true bricks and mortar of human mental and social life), the capitalists’ mass media created the smokescreen of cultural assault to draw them into the big tent of defense against the inevitable assault on private property which is the product of, well, centuries of the lions’ share of population increasingly having less of it.
Marx describes a world in which the rich care more for their property than for anything else. This is a supreme insight, but not beyond the discovery of any provoked mind, however simple. The radical dialectic of today’s corporate propaganda, however, is that the rich pretend to care more for culture than their property.
But we may know how very much this is a pretense.
(via colinbrineman)
Posted on March 28, 2011 via WAITING FOR BRODOT
Source: marxists.org